BP has complained that a lawyer in Louisiana who is administering its settlement with tens of thousands of Gulf Coast businesses and residents has made decisions that expose BP to what could be billions of dollars in fictitious claims arising from the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
Now the court-appointed administrator himself is investigating allegations that could provide the London-based oil giant with fodder for its argument that it hasn’t gotten a fair shake from the claims-processing team.
Lafayette-based lawyer Patrick Juneau confirmed Friday that he has opened an internal investigation of alleged misconduct by one of his staff attorneys, Lionel H. Sutton III.
Sutton resigned Friday morning, Juneau spokesman Nick Gagliano told The Associated Press.
A report outlining the allegations, a copy of which was obtained by the AP, accuses Sutton of “writing polices” that benefited himself and other plaintiffs’ lawyers. It does not elaborate.
Prepared by Juneau’s office, the report also says a “confidential source” who contacted Juneau’s security chief accused Sutton of trying to influence a claim filed by the New Orleans-based Andry Law Firm. The same firm allegedly paid Sutton a portion of settlement proceeds for claims he had referred to it before he went to work for Juneau.
Juneau provided the report to U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier during a meeting in his chambers Thursday. The administrator has pledged to thoroughly investigate the claims involving Sutton, who started working for his office in November 2012, according to the report.
Both BP and claimants “rightfully expect fairness and objectivity from this claims process,” Juneau wrote.
“Our goal is to operate in an efficient, transparent and fair manner. All allegations are taken seriously and investigated thoroughly.”
But in its own statement Friday, BP said only a “comprehensive and independent investigation will ensure the integrity of the claims process.”
Sutton acknowledged in an email late Thursday that he had been told he was suspended “pending an investigation of an anonymous allegation against me.”
“I have not been made aware of the substance of the allegation or the status of the investigation,” Sutton wrote. “Once this is resolved, I would be happy to discuss it all with you.”
According to the report, Sutton denied the allegations when Juneau discussed them with him.
“Sutton advised Juneau that he did not retain any interest in the claims or clients and the allegations were 100 percent incorrect,” the report says.
But the report also cites passages from a string of email exchanges in which Sutton allegedly asks about his cut of nearly $500,000 in settlement payments to an individual who had filed several seafood-related claims.